By Sanah Faroke, Staff Writer
Despite all these issues I have with nature, I moved from Miami, Fla. to Boston, Mass. for school, but also because of the culture and the four seasons. I may not extend my walks too far from the Boston University bubble as often as I would like, but for some reason, being outside and experiencing the wind on my face, the leaves wavering on tree branches and all the colors of fall clears my mind, if only for a while, but nature has that wonderful affect on me.
Yes, I’m still in the city, but when I get away from the city for a bit, I have a clearer outlook on life and I’m able to focus more when I hit the books or when I have to make a long term decision.
To those who actually go on trips to ski and hike, kudos to you. It’s just not for me, but regardless of the type of nature you intake, it’s no wonder that being outside actually makes us feel good.
Don’t you kind of wish you went on a walk now before having that fifth cup of coffee now? I’ll help you out. The answer is yes.
Researchers have found that when we look at natural landscapes, it can make us more focused in our decision-making processes. In the study, researchers created two different slideshows, one that had natural landscapes and the other that was in a city environment.
Volunteers had to view either the natural or the urban slideshow, in which they listened to an audio that tried to convince the volunteers to become immersed with the landscape they viewed. After all the volunteers watched the slideshow, the researchers offered them either 100 euros ($135) now or a larger sum in 90 days, in which the price would increase in 10 euro ($13) increments until the volunteer chose that new reward over the initial sum.
Here’s where it gets interesting: the volunteers that saw the more natural slideshow rather than the concrete urban slideshow were more willing to wait for an extra 20, 30 or 40 euros. And thus, researchers hinted that the participants who viewed the natural photos were able to make more logical decisions and made them more open to the idea for a delayed gratification.
To make sure that this wasn’t a hoax, the researchers did subsequent experiments with the same idea of showing natural beauty versus a concrete setting and then offered immediate or delayed financial awards to three groups. Like clockwork, participants who were immersed by nature were more inclined to get the delayed future award.
According to the research that appeared this week in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, this implies that those with exposure to natural scenes tend to care more for the future. Kind of scary since we live in this great, giant city called Boston, but there are ways to get your daily dose of nature.
According to researchers, it is possible that on a psychological standpoint, nature moves at a slower pace, while life in the city is so fast paced and we want everything immediate, so we want to mimic what we see.
I’ve tried to take this study into my own hands and while I’m not planning on going fishing or mountain biking, there are many alternatives for city people, like myself, who would rather watch The Big Bang Theory reruns than wake up at 5 a.m. to see the sunrise. You could go to the Esplanade or sail on the Charles River or take a stroll in the Boston Commons. If you want to take it a step further, there’s whale watching, walking trails in the forest, the sandy Boston Harbor National Park and white water rafting.
Don’t like my ideas? You can do some research for yourself or take a hike — literally (and gain some clarity while you’re at it).
The happy camper
If you ever wanted to envision me camping…
By Maya Devereaux, Staff Writer
Today marks the 40th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision made in Roe v. Wade. What has changed? Has much changed in terms of opinion? Has the debate taken a new turn?
The 1973 ruling deemed state laws restricting abortion unconstitutional, causing a wave of controversy that still persists. The two main sides of this hot topic are pretty much clear cut, and it appears there hasn’t been a much of a shiftEven as there seems to be a large surge or younger people leaning toward the pro-choice side of the spectrum, data show that there has not been a big fluctuation between opinions. According to a 2011 Gallup Poll, the statistics vary only slightly, with 56% of US adults considering themselves pro-choice, up 7% since 1995.
Also unchanged is March for Life, the pro-life rally that has taken place annually in Washington, DC on Jan. 22 since the court decision’s first anniversary. This year, however, the protest to overturn Roe v. Wade will occur on the Jan. 25, three days after its usual date.
Women who opt for abortion are mostly in their 20s, with rates of abortion dropping significantly with women 30 and older, according to the Centers for Disease Control. The introduction of the Plan B pill and the rise of pregnancy in young women has drawn attention to the often overlooked difference between emergency contraception and abortion. This mix-up, between the abortion pill and the Plan B pill, are causing some to believe they can rely on the latter to terminate a pregnancy, which is, in fact, not true. Such issues have the potential to change the direction of the abortion debate towards other debates involving birth control and even more complex issues.