By Tom Ford, Daily Free Press Contributor
Last night, at approximately 11:15 p.m. Eastern time, the state of Ohio was projected to fall on the side of President Obama, a raucous cheer broke out across America, celebrating the end of a long, arduous campaign that’s left a deeply divided nation behind in its tracks. As the weeks dragged on, more and more money went into increasingly negative ad campaigns that had many confused about what positives there were to be had from either candidate.
Yet here we are. In a night that also saw multiple states legalizing gay marriage, America has seemingly taken a stand on the issue of whether a business background and plans to revamp the economy are enough to make up for a somewhat antiquated view on social issues. Romney ran a strong campaign, don’t get me wrong; however, it seems that Obama’s message of moving forward and finishing the work that he’s started resonated with people in swing states.
The biggest shock of the night arguably came a few hours before the end result was announced; Pennsylvania, a state many analysts predicted swinging toward Romney, went to the President. This is likely due to the large presence of the auto industry and steel industry in the state, both of which might have been a bit turned off by Romney’s anti-bailout stances.
Elizabeth Warren was elected Senator in Massachusetts, winning a heavily-contested battle that acted as a referendum on Brown’s handling of the Wall Street fiscal crisis. Needless to say, the Harvard Professors message of a “fair shot” for the middle-class was persuasive, with the race being called relatively early in the night.
All in all, this election has served to teach us a few things about ourselves, both positive and negative. First, our young generation of voters is one that is very passionate about having a say in their future. There was not a day that I could go without seeing a dozen posts on some sort of social media about the election. Next, we’re trending toward spending an ungodly amount of money on campaigns. Unfortunately, most of this went into negative ads this year. Finally, we’re very willing to be at each other’s throats to defend our personal views. Impassioned rants about why Mitt Romney is evil or about how Obama is a covert Muslim Kenyan terrorist really soured my first Presidential election, to say the least.
Ah well, four more years until this political circus rears its head again. God bless.
By Tom Ford, Daily Free Press contributor
The third presidential debate, which took place at Lynn University in Florida, was a discussion that, while slated to center around the candidates’ foreign policy platforms, frequently reverted back to a discussion of life at home. Both candidates made it clear that while there are significant threats to our national security from groups like Al-Qaeda, a strong economy will give us a visage of strength and will renew confidence in our capability to lead. Governor Romney continually hammered on the economic “failings” of the past four years, and President Obama emphasized the questionable math in Romney’s tax plans.
As for actual foreign policy issues, the two candidates seemed equally fervent in their views, although Obama often emerged as the more knowledgeable candidate. When the Governor made mention of the decreased number of naval ships, Obama responded with arguably the best line of the night: “Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets.”
In addition to causing an immediate Internet sensation, this comment also serves as a critique of Romney’s foreign policy as a whole. The main criticism from many pundits has been that Romney’s “Tough America” views on such issues as the Syrian civil war and Iran is antiquated; diplomacy is a much more 21st Century solution to our problems. Romney’s stances toward Ahmadinejad tend toward Cold War paranoia at times.
I don’t really like taking sides in political discussions, as it usually leads to me being berated by one side or the other. That being said, I have to say that this third debate, arguably the most important of this cycle, was undeniably an Obama victory. The President had a focus and precision that we’ve arguably yet to see in this election. He made sure to answer the moderator’s questions, and keep the discussion on topic. In addition, he was very clear about what he has done in the past four years, a stark contrast to the Republican emphasis on what he hasn’t done. While Obama’s foreign policy platform has been reduced to “We Killed Osama bin Laden” for the majority of the race, tonight showed us that he has other accomplishments to hang his hat on. The removal of troops from Iraq, the strengthening of our ties to Israel and the implementation of sanctions on Iran are all decisive steps toward ensuring our position as leaders of the free world.
On a lighter note, I’m glad to see that both of the candidates read my blog about the last debate; they were civil, waited their turns to speak and conducted themselves in a manner that is appropriate for the potential next President of the United States. Guys, remember, I’d be more than happy to help out in the future; just give me a call. Barack, I know you already have my number.
By Tom Ford, Daily Free Press Contributor
In the second Presidential debate of 2012, a town hall-format discussion at Hofstra University in New York, a discussion of the economy led Governor Romney to claim that our current economic track is akin to that of the failing European Union. Greece faces an enormous debt crisis, which could inevitably bring down the entire European economy if quick action isn’t taken. That being said, this quote from Romney resonated a bit differently with me.
Greece, arguably, is the birthplace of intellectual debate. The famed philosopher Socrates believed in a method of debate that involved the divulgence of one’s opinion on clearly defined questions. To win such an argument, one not only needed to focus his attention on the matter at hand, but also to present his views in a manner that was conducive to productive discussion. In the time of Socrates and Greece’s Golden Age, a combination of rhetorical skill and decorum was necessary to contending in such a discussion.
Tonight, we witnessed the degradation of the American debate system. In a conversation that centered around important topics such as women’s rights, economic disparity, and the safety of Americans overseas, it was hard not to be distracted by the constant bickering and interruption on the part of both of the candidates. At one point when discussing oil, President Obama and Governor Romney became locked in an exchange where each got five words in at a time, and the American public gained nothing.
There were many points during the debate tonight that had me wondering what the question being answered was. Candidates dodged weaknesses and hammered on the opponent’s views. If I had a dollar for every time that Governor Romney mentioned President Obama’s “failures,” I’d be in a tax bracket that has something to gain from the Romney/Ryan tax plan.
The Barack Obama of 2008 (or even 2004) was a man who instilled hope in young Americans by employing the rhetoric of a Washington outsider. This time around, I find the President embroiled in more than his fair share of petty arguments that, a lot of the time, lack substance. For those of you that disagree, let me ask this: When has the President brought up gay marriage since his revelation of an “evolution” in his stance? When has he gone an entire speech or debate without demonizing Republicans for the failings of our government? He abandons a passionate discussion of his values for the opportunity to throw in a zinger about the 1 percent or Romney’s wealth.
To borrow a phrase from Mr. Obama, let me be clear: we are at a crossroads in this country. We have arguably not seen such an extreme contempt by either party for the other in decades. Both candidates spent more time tonight speaking negatively of the other’s policies than giving us an idea of what to expect in the next four years from their respective administrations.
When we wake up tomorrow morning, it is likely that we will see a wide spread of opinions on how the debate went. The President came out assertive enough tonight to mobilize his base, they will say. The Governor was able to hold his own when dealing about issues that clearly were not to his advantage, they will say.
If you’re a Republican, you’ll be pleased with how Mitt Romney performed tonight. If you’re a Democrat, you’ll be pleased with how Barack Obama performed tonight. If you’re an American, you should be displeased with the tenor of this campaign, and the direction of American politics in this 2012 campaign.
As for me, I’ll be waiting for the bus to Athens.
By Maya Devereaux, Staff Writer
Although Obama’s 2008 inauguration was almost four years ago, I will never forget sitting in my tenth grade biology class watching the event take place on live television. I have a sharp memory my classmates’ reactions: the boy to my left was staring on almost with tears in his eyes, the girl sitting to my right was sleeping with her head down on the desk.
These observations have frequently come to mind recently, whenever I hear talk about the election around campus. So this made me curious about students here at Boston University. What are their opinions on voting this upcoming November?
I spoke with various students across campus and found that many of them plan on voting. Of those who said they will not be voting, many gave reasons relating to eligibility.
“I’m not a citizen,” said College of Arts and Sciences freshman Kelly Chen, “maybe if I were, I would vote though.” Another popular answer involved not being of age in time to vote.
When asked about the reasons why some students vote for certain candidates, School of Management senior Jinelle Pecson said, “half of them are following the news and have legitimate reasons to vote for a candidate, while the other half goes with what the environment says.”
Aman Sharma, a sophomore in CAS, brought up a good point and said, “a majority of young people are swayed by their parents.”
But does who you affiliate yourself with always have a correlation with who your parents affiliate themselves with?
“The ones who know why they’re voting for their candidate of choice will definitely have a good reason for doing so,” said Benjamin Wildman, a CAS freshman.
Whether or not students have a reason for voting for a specific candidate, there is definitely a ton of awareness on campus about voting in the upcoming election. Students mention hearing many discussions about voting, even if it’s just over a joke about a certain candidate.
With 40 days until election day, the time left for registering to vote is dwindling down. As I anxiously await the arrival of my absentee ballot in the mail, I hope that many others across campus are, too.