Tagged: J.K Rowling

Pop Culture Countdown: Full House Reunions, Grammys, and Beyoncé

By Danny McCarthy, Staff Writer

Remember when I wrote about men’s fashion? I was so good at that, right? (Just agree with me.) Well, now I’ve decided to foray into the great wilderness that is pop culture, armed with only a dream and access to the Internet. Join me as we count down the top seven things that you might have missed this week in pop culture!

7. “Full House”:

Apparently there is a “Full House” reunion in the works! The iconic television show, which ran from 1987-1995, was almost a religion in my household, and its ongoing popularity has proved that it probably held the same position in the lives of others. According to an interview John Stamos did with CBS News, the project will be “sort of reunion-like, not with the full cast.” So who do you think will be in the Full House reunion? Let us know in the comments below!

6. Ron and Hermione: Happily Never After?:

My world is coming to a halt because J.K. Rowling, in a new article (in which she was interviewed by Emma Watson — perfection) announced that she isn’t quite certain that Ron and Hermione should have ended up together. The author instead wished that she had put Harry and Hermione together instead. Personally, I can see Hermione and Ron not working out, but Harry and Hermione just seems…weird. Whose team are you on? Ron or Harry?

5. Beyoncé:

As per usual, Beyoncé was flawless at the Grammys. Using only a chair, smoke and her own perfection as props, she gave a sultry, strong rendition of “Drunk in Love”, a song from her new self-titled album, BEYONCÉ. Her husband, rapper Jay-Z, joined the performer later in the song. Despite the song being censored live, parents are in an uproar about the duet, citing it to be a little too risqué for children. What do you think? Was Beyoncé’s dance too sexy for the Grammys?

4. The “Midnight Memories” music video:

I had to put this in here. One Direction, the boy band that’s sweeping the nation, nay, the world, released the music video for the titular song of their album, Midnight Memories. The video, which has over 8.5 million views on YouTube, features the boys hanging out with old ladies and generally getting rowdy, while making it seem like the most fun thing in the world, as only One Direction can.

3. Miley Cyrus, “Unplugged”:

Miley Cyrus had complete creative control over her MTV program, “Unplugged”, taking a decidedly Southern twist on her breakout album Bangerz. The artist, glowing in a platinum pixie cut and bedazzled cowboy gear, had Madonna on as a guest performer, but made it clear that she had originally wanted Dolly Parton to join her. And if there is no other proof that Miley is the new Queen of Pop, there is the fact that Madonna was her second choice. Sorry, Mads.

2. “The Fault In Our Stars” movie trailer:

This one dances close to my heart. The trailer for “The Fault in Our Stars”, adapted from John Green’s New York Times bestseller, premiered on Wednesday, already racking up eight million views on YouTube. Whether you have loved the book since its release, or fell in love with Augustus Waters’ lazy smirk, you know that this is one movie you have to see. With Shailene Woodley and Ansel Elgort leading an amazing cast, hopefully “The Fault in Our Stars” can live up to the beauty of its source material.

1. “Same Love” marriages:

Keeping up with all the feels, I had to double up on Grammy love this week. 34 couples, gay and straight, were married during the Grammys after a rendition of Macklemore’s groundbreaking song, “Same Love.” Making Grammy history, the occasion proved that music isn’t just for topping billboard charts or making money: it is, has been, and hopefully always will be, a vehicle for change. And it makes for a kick-ass wedding story!

That’s all for this week, if there’s anything I missed, or anything you think should be included in the Pop Culture Countdown next week, sound off in the comments below!


Harry Potter: The Fandom That Lived

By Katrina Uy, Staff Writer

“…Our grandkids will ask us if we’re still reading “Harry Potter,” even after all this time. And we’ll reply, “Always.””/PHOTO VIA Wikimedia Commons

The last “Harry Potter book came out in 2007, and the last movie was released in 2011. It’s hard to believe it’s only been about three years since new canon material was released. Yet, the fandom continues to live on.

Just last week, Entertainment Weekly readers dubbed the “Harry Potter” series “The Best Young Adult Novel of All Time,” beating out “The Fault in Our Stars” by John Green. Even Green admitted to voting for Potter instead of his own novel, saying, “”Harry Potter” is the most important story for a generation of readers and is one of the central reasons that my career even exists, so it’s a bit silly even to be in the ring with it here at the end.”

Growing up, I remember pretending to play quidditch in my backyard with my younger brother, chasing each other around with broomsticks between our legs. I reread every single book and re-watched every movie until I knew them all by heart, dreamed of going to conventions like LeakyCon with hundreds of other “Harry Potter” fans, and died of happiness when I visited the Wizarding World of Harry Potter theme park at Universal Orlando Resort for the first time.

You could say I was (and still am) a bit of a dork. To me, and to many others out there, Harry Potter means more than just a series of books and a wildly successful film franchise.

But where will the fandom be, 10 years from now? After the release of “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” the final installment of the series, J.K. Rowling stated that she would not write any new sequels in the future. Where does that leave the fans?

It’s unlikely that the world will ever see a complete resurgence of Potter mania like it did in the 2000s. With no new books or movies of the original series being produced practically every other year like they used to, how can one expect a mass of die-hard fans to get as excited as they once did, discussing theories on forums and writing endless fanfictions about their favorite characters?

The answer is: you can’t. But fans still have material to get excited over. It was revealed in September that Rowling and Warner Bros. would again be working together on a film inspired by “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” a short book Rowling wrote that takes place in the Potter universe. Though the new movie will focus on a wizard named Newt Scamander and his travels in New York City in the 1920s instead of on Harry, Ron and Hermione, fans still went wild.

The Potter fandom’s flame has been dimmed but it will not be extinguished forever. Entertainment Weekly’s poll has shown that readers still believe Harry’s story will continue to live on long after the series’ time in the limelight has passed.

Fans will no doubt read the books to their children, and their children’s children, and inevitable remakes of the films and further spinoffs such as “Fantastic Beasts” will continue to spark interest in younger generations.

And even if magic and fantasy aren’t the “in” thing by the time our grandchildren stumble upon “Harry Potter,” the series’ themes of good versus evil and the power of love will prevail for decades.

Fifty years from now, our grandkids will ask us if we’re still reading “Harry Potter,” even after all this time. And we’ll reply, “Always.”

Spotlight: BU Harry Potter Alliance Chapter: Dumbledore’s Army

By Samantha Wong, Staff Writer

BU's Harry Potter Alliance chapter, 'Dumbledore's Army'/PHOTO COURTESY OF Yi Feng

BU’s Harry Potter Alliance chapter, ‘Dumbledore’s Army.’/PHOTO COURTESY OF Yi Feng

Most muggles ­do not have magic on the brain. ‘Muggle’ is the term J.K. Rowling uses to describe non-magical folk within the Harry Potter series. Of course, according to Rowling, most muggles don’t think about magic because they have already refused to accept that it even exists.

However, the Harry Potter Alliance and Boston University’s chapter, Dumbledore’s Army, prove that magic doesn’t have to be spells or curses to be practiced. Within the community, average muggles like you and I, can practice a less literal magic that wows. In this case, magic can be the simple thought of giving back to the community. Most people are amazed by the effects giving back can have.

Giving back can be something as small as donating books to others or selling free trade chocolate in the shape of chocolate frogs. Even getting together a group of people with a common interest in a character can be life changing for others.

What I never considered was that Harry Potter, other than being a great wizard for vanquishing the dark lord Voldemort, could be more than a character. It had not occurred to me that a book, which became a series loved by millions, could be something other than a book. Harry Potter’s name now stands as a symbol for hope. Harry Potter inspires change for the better.

As J.K. Rowling remarks on the Harry Potter Alliance website, “I am honoured and humbled that Harry’s name has been given to such an extraordinary campaign, which really does exemplify the values for which Dumbledore’s Army fought in the books.”

British Invasion: Why Americans love British TV

By Heather Goldin, Staff Writer

British TV

MEME BY DraconicArts | tennantstype40 graphics

Let’s be honest. We all have our favorite British television show, whether we care to admit it. Why do we fall head over heels for these shows over our own American reality television shows? Is it the creative plot lines, or is it their brilliant British slang? Blimey! You would have to be a wanker not to love British TV. Whether its “Doctor Who,” “Sherlock,” “Misfits,” “Peep Show,” the list of our favorite British shows go on and on. The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) always gives us a reason to watch.

However, our love of Great Britain spans far beyond TV. Take into account the famous “Harry Potter” series, written by British novelist J.K. Rowling. As you probably already know from BBC’s Twitter feed, the world of British television is colliding with popular British novels, courtesy of BBC’s decision to adapt Rowling’s newest novel ‘The Casual Vacancy” as a television series. Set to debut in 2014, the show is sure to join our list of British television favorites. Despite some poor literary critics’ reviews, possibly holding a grudge against Britain for their tyrannical history, the novel still ranks high on the New York Times best-seller list. Rowling will be working closely with the BBC network to make sure her literary vision is successfully translated to the television screen.

Keep your eyes on the telly for the premiere showing of “The Casual Vacancy.” I’d be gobsmacked if the show were anything short of bloody addicting.

Confused by some of my language? If you ever find yourself in Britain, this online dictionary of British slang might be useful. And if not, you can always talk like a Brit for fun!

The Casual Vacancy

STORIFY VIA HeatherGoldin’s Storify account